Showing posts with label IPCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPCC. Show all posts

Monday, 3 December 2012

Pacific women in climate change - meet Dr Netatua Pelesikoti, Tonga



Dr Netatua Pelesikoti

This is the second in a series of human interest stories by SPREP’s Nanette Woonton on Pacific women showing leadership in the climate change field.

30 November 2012, Doha, Qatar - For the first time ever, a Pacific woman is one of the lead authors in the next report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Dr Netatua Pelesikoti from Tonga is the Director of the Climate change division at the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP).  She is also a lead contributor to Chapter 29 on Small Islands in the 5th Assessment Report.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change.  It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organization in 1998, and won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for its work on climate change.

The 5th Assessment Report is to provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of knowledge in climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic impacts.  The report is the leading climate change reference report by the international community.  Having undergone rigorous scientific review, information from this document is quoted often at the UN climate negotiations, referred to in research reports and news articles. 

Being one of the lead authors for the small island chapter is not an easy feat. 

Dr Pelesikoti during the AOSIS preparatory meeting, COP 18

“Time management has been a challenge for me in contributing my work towards the report as well as managing a division of over 20 staff,” said Dr. Pelesikoti.

“8am to 5pm is a short day!  I have really had to draw upon dedication, dedication, dedication and commitment in order to achieve as much as I can!”

She has come a long way. 

Dr Pelesikoti, or Neta as she is often called, is well known throughout the Pacific region having had over 20 years worth of experience in climate change, coastal management and disaster risk management. 

She began as an environmental technical officer in Tonga and then progressed to working on policy and management at the national level including monitoring and evaluation, training, and project management.     

She was also an advisor at the Secretariat of the Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC).  Often described as the ‘Queen of Disaster Risk Management’ in the Pacific region, Neta is well received and welcomed by many Pacific island communities who have spent time with her in their work field.

Dr Pelesikoti is a coastal ecologist by profession. She did her first degree at the University of the South Pacific in geography and economics; she completed her Masters in Coastal Management in the Netherlands and finished her Phd in Australia in coastal monitoring focusing on the coastal water quality, coral reef and seagrass.

Now Dr Pelesikoti is staking her claim in the international region having attended the UN Climate Change Negotiations since 2010 and with her role as a Leading Author in Chapter 29 of the 5th IPCC Assessment Report. 

“I enjoy making a difference where I can this is a highlight for me in my work.”

“Whether this difference is in developing a government policy, providing advice or working with the community in an activity to build their resilience or simply through watering a plant - I enjoy making a difference and this is what really drives me in my work.”

Neta’s career has seen sacrifices made along the way, a mother of two teenagers, her family is spread across the Pacific region in Tonga, Fiji and Australia, with her based in Samoa.  However the demands of her job require a lot of attention. 

As the Director of the Climate Change Division she must coordinate and oversee her team that also manages multi-million dollar projects across the Pacific region.  Along with this her role also includes providing input and guidance as a member of the Senior Management Team to help with the running of the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme.

A typical day for her in the office includes a staff meeting, project development planning and reporting, communications work, negotiations and meetings with partners and donors as well as management meetings.  She is constantly, constantly working.

“It’s challenging and I thrive in challenges and I know what I'm doing and am good at it!”

Dr Pelesikoti with the Tuvalu delegation during a break at the COP 18

Dr Netatua has a keen scientific mind.  Having worked with her for the last several years, we often talk about emotive news versus scientific news, which leads to now being the right time to share Neta’s personal attributes.

In the office she is a strong Pacific island woman.  Her opinions are bold and she is thick skinned, I admire that you can debate and discuss issues with her and then quickly move on to the next issue, she moves on and gets over things quickly.

At the same time, Neta is also a generous Pacific island woman that often shows Pacific hospitality.  It is this Pacific cultural grounding which has helped her be at home whether she is attending bilateral meetings in the corridors of the UN climate negotiations, or if she is providing community advice in a fale near the coast in the Pacific islands. 

Neta is a hard worker, with this work ethic and dedication she has persevered in her field.  I admire her strong work ethics that have propelled her into the world stage, seeing her name stamped on an internationally reputed document on climate change.  It is no easy feat to provide accepted scientific input as well as be the Manager of a large division.

Dr Pelesikoti with fellow delegates from Tonga
 
Congratulations Neta.

In closing her interview, she imparts this tip for other Pacific women entering into their professional career, a short tidbit that can help many other Pacific island women be successful at whatever they do.

“Use your talents and share your experiences and skills to make a positive impact in your career, family, country, region and the world.”

I like it, good sound advice.  Onwards and Upwards!

Pacific Women in Climate Change

Friday, 27 May 2011

Lessons for Future Action Conference 23-26 May 2011, Samoa

The four day conference has brought together practitioners, policy makers and researchers from the Pacific, the Caribbean, and the West Indian Ocean to examine how lessons learned today can inform climate change adaptation and future disaster risk management in Small Island Developing States.



The following information is coverage of presentations publicized from the first three days of the conference.

Click on the highlight text to view the presentations.

1. Information and Awareness Raising
Chair: Roger McLean, IPCC Lead Coordinating Author, Small Islands
Topics of presentations:

- Awareness raising – understanding the risk
-  Community perceptions of and responses to climate change and risk
- Baseline data needs – what we need to attribute climate change
- Underpinning science and modeling tools
- Communicating the science







2. National Planning and Policy Frameworks
Chair: David Sheppard, Director of the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme [SPREP]

Topics of presentations:


International and regional frameworks, national policy and planning frameworks
 - Do national policy and planning frameworks meet emerging   needs?
 - Developing nationally relevant policy frameworks for CCA and  DRR
 - What role does CCA and DRR play in core policy development?

DRR and CCA synergies and opportunities at the national level

- What have we learned from joint national planning?










3. Community Based Responses to CCA and DRR
Chair: Frank Wickham, Solomon Islands
Topics of presentations:

Application of demand driven and bottom up experience and planning

Sustainable development and building resilience for DRR and CCA (including adaptive capacity and traditional responses)

DDR and CCA synergies and opportunities at the local level (including lessons learned from joint national planning)
Linking national planning to local and sub-national levels
-          Scaling up to national, regional and global support
-       Sustainability considerations of CCA and DRR




Strengthening Adaptive Capacity in Choiseul, Solomon Islands, Robyn James

 4. Strategies and On-Ground Options
Chair: Leonard Nurse, IPCC Lead Editor for SIDS
Topics of presentations:

What works on the ground
-  Effective adaptation options – what’s the best way to provide support?
 - Sectoral approaches to risk management
 - Adaptation/Renewable energy                    opportunities
 -  Actual experiences with CCA and DRR – challenges and opportunities

What combination of CCA and DRR deliver the most benefits?  (public/private partnerships, those that integrate DRR, CCA and economic development, community involvement)
















5. Capacity Development
Chair: Edward Green, Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre
Topics of presentations:

What is capacity development and how is it best developed?

Regional responses and needs of the smallest countries

Developing business plans and project proposals

Accessing resources



















6.  Lessons for Future Action
Chair: Rob Kay,  Coastal Zone Management (Australia)


Thursday, 10 June 2010

AOSIS lose fight to get technical analysis of the social and economic impact of climate change




By Makereta Komai for Climate Pasifika in Bonn, Germany

10 June 2010, Bonn, Germany --- A showdown between the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) supported by over 110 countries against Gulf States closed Wednesday’s session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA).

AOSIS had proposed that SBSTA request the United Nations climate change secretariat to prepare a technical paper on the social and economical impacts of the mitigation scenarios of 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius of average global temperature.

The proposal was shot down by representatives of the four Gulf States of Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait.

“The necessary pledges required to achieve the scenarios mentioned would require a great deal more than the capacity of the secretariat to undertake and will therefore not accept a compromised text, said Saudi Arabia.

The four Gulf States questioned the need for technical paper given that the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had already released its 4th Assessment Report. 

“How can the secretariat produce such a report in just a few months before Cancun? I don’t think we should proceed in that direction and come with a half baked view in 2-3 months, argued Saudi Arabia.

Barbados and Grenada on behalf of AOSIS clarified that the technical paper hopes to pool together all the sciences available in the public domain to assist vulnerable states address climate change.

Adding its voice to the AOSIS proposal, the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) reiterated the importance of the technical analysis of the social and economic impacts of the mitigation scenarios to small and vulnerable states.

“For us the impacts of sea level rise are of enormous importance. This technical paper could provide information to help us with policy decisions. It’s a tool that we could have in some short months.

“It’s puzzling to see objections from the floor, said FSM.

On Thursday, a quick diplomatic intervention brokered by Venezuela resolved the impasse which remained unresolved from Thursday night.

Venezuela introduced a compromised text which required the secretariat to prepare a technical paper, on its own will, before the Cancun meeting.

Discussions spilled over to Thursday when the chair ruled to postpone debate until the next meeting of the scientific body in Cancun.

A disappointed AOSIS chair, Grenada diplomat, Ambassador Dessima Williams said the responses of the ‘few countries’ that opposed the AOSIS proposal ‘borders on alarming.’

“I find it incomprehensible that our simple request has been met with much opposition.  But I find comfort in the fact that the opposition is only limited and look forward to a return of this issue in Cancun."

Ambassador Colin Beck of Solomon Islands was disappointed but didn’t want to let the decision of SBSTA affect other important issues for small island states at the negotiations here in Bonn.

“In these negotiations, when we fall, we get up again and look for another window to keep pressing our issue. While the 1.5 degrees is central to our negotiating position, we need Parties to understand us and we understand them. We need to continue with the spirit of reaching out to each other that has begun here in Bonn", said Ambassador Beck.



When SBSTA resumed Thursday morning, young people carrying banner with 1.5 degree messages lined the corridor leading to the conference centre to remind delegates of the kind of future they are giving to them if they oppose the AOSIS proposal.

“This message is directed at Saudi Arabia especially said a 20 year old German student who was part of the 350.org group of young people holding placards.

“We want a safe and secure future for us, said another.

112 countries, including the powerful G77 group, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand supported small island states call for a technical paper.

Ms Makereta Komai will be covering the Bonn Climate Change negotiations from 31 May – 11 June 2010, thanks to support from Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). She will provide daily coverage of the negotiations via PACNEWS and the SPREP website www.sprep.org, the climate pasifika blogspot, http://climatepasifika.blogspot.com and the PINA Green page http://green.pina.com.fj/  

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

Climate negotiators farewell Yvo de Boer, rich nations exhorted to show leadership






By Makereta Komai for Climate Pasifika in Bonn, Germany

09 June 2010, Bonn, Germany ---- After close to four years at the helm of the United Nations climate change body, Yvo de Boer has completed his term, six months after the failed talks in Copenhagen.

And before leaving Bonn on 01 July, the Dutch national shared his final thoughts with negotiators Wednesday at special joint session of the two technical subsidiary bodies.

Using what he called a World Cup imagery, de Boer said, “We got a yellow card in Copenhagen and the referee’s hand will edge toward the red one if we fail to deliver in Cancun and beyond.

A red card is definite if rich countries fail to commit to stringent pledges – an 80 percent goal for the middle century is not enough.

“I hope that I have not lost too many friends with this statement and will not lose more.

De Boer said deciding what each and everyone will contribute to this requires more than one round of negotiations. 

The current pledges from industrialised countries are not sufficient to bring us into the 25-40% range that the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects in its most ambitious scenario.

“Having said this, we cannot afford to postpone more stringent action much longer. As things stand now we will not be able to halt the increase of global greenhouse gas emissions in the next ten years.

With the 2 degree, the world is in danger, and as a result the door to a 1.5 degree world is rapidly closing, said de Boer.

There is strong consensus that a legally binding agreement is the preference of all the Parties but the outgoing climate change chief reminded negotiators that ‘legally binding’ mean different things to different people.

“This is good, because it offers an opportunity to define the concept in much broader terms than internationally binding rich country targets alone.

“Legal rigour and ambition are, in and of themselves, not a sine qua non. Rigorous sanctions combined with a lack of clarity on tools and incentives are more likely to engender caution than bravery.”

De Boer exhorted Parties to allow for room for discussion to complement negotiation.

“More often the focus is on interpretation of stated positions rather than debate to understand the nature of underlying interests.”

On the expected outcome for Cancun, the departing climate change diplomat said there needs to be clarity on ‘what is technical and what is political, what political decisions are needed to make technical work possible and how technical talks should be effectively organised.”

“These are not issues you can agree on with 15,000 people in the room. A clear mandate to work in a smaller setting and report back to the Conference of the Parties (COP) is enough. 

Maintaining his confidence in the UNFCCC process, de Boer told over 1,000 delegates that packed the conference room at the Maritim Hotel that, ‘I am confident - You did it in Rio. You did it in Kyoto. You did it Bali. You will do it again in Cancun.’

His departure takes effect July 1, five months before 193 nations are due to reconvene in Mexico for another attempt to reach a binding worldwide accord on controlling greenhouse gases. He is known to be deeply disappointed with outcome of the last summit in Copenhagen.

He is being replaced by long time Costa Rican climate change negotiator, Christiana Figueres.

Ms Komai will be covering the Bonn Climate Change negotiations from 31 May – 11 June 2010, thanks to support from Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). She will provide daily coverage of the negotiations via PACNEWS and the SPREP website www.sprep.org, the climate pasifika blogspot, http://climatepasifika.blogspot.com and the PINA Green page http://green.pina.com.fj/